Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
al-qadim:abjured-incantations [2020-10-07 23:00] – Made some non-alphabetical edits www-data | al-qadim:abjured-incantations [2020-10-07 23:13] – [Jonquille] sandra | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
is this: Given any incantations (not necessarily distinct), such as | is this: Given any incantations (not necessarily distinct), such as | ||
for example Zaoth, Yagoth, and Rhoa, the incantation Rhoa is said to | for example Zaoth, Yagoth, and Rhoa, the incantation Rhoa is said to | ||
- | _abjure__ | + | _abjure_ |
following sigil remains unbroken: | following sigil remains unbroken: | ||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
An incantation, | An incantation, | ||
is a divination of itself. That is, if Vhlorrhothee' | is a divination of itself. That is, if Vhlorrhothee' | ||
- | Vhlorrhothee | + | Vhlorrhothee |
**The problem is to prove** that under the given sigils Abupa and | **The problem is to prove** that under the given sigils Abupa and | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
variant of the ur-problem: We are only given the sigil Abupa; we are | variant of the ur-problem: We are only given the sigil Abupa; we are | ||
**not** given that there is an Unattainable Pearl of Night in the | **not** given that there is an Unattainable Pearl of Night in the | ||
- | tale; instead, we are given that there is a corresponding | + | tale; instead, we are given that there is a corresponding |
**Is this enough to guarantee that every incantation is a divination | **Is this enough to guarantee that every incantation is a divination | ||
of at least one incantation? | of at least one incantation? | ||